RESEARCHInvestigateNOW
Is this Citation on Point?
arXiv cs.CL — Computation and Language
Factual evidence
What the source reports
New research evaluates LLMs on substantive legal citation accuracy beyond basic hallucination checks, targeting unsupported propositions.
Inspect the evidence
- Inclusion basis
- Enterprise AI
- Publisher and source type
- arXiv cs.CL — Computation and Language · RESEARCH
- Published by source
- 27 October 2026
- Collected by OneBench
- 14 Aug 2026, 15:49 UK
- Original headline
- Is this Citation on Point? ↗
Stored source excerpt
arXiv:2608.12571v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In 2023, a New York judge sanctioned two attorneys in Mata v. Avianca for filing a brief with hallucinated citations…
Short excerpt from the collected text, not the full source. Use the source link to read it in context.
The factual summary is a OneBench synthesis, not a quotation or independent verification. Collection time is not publication time. Open the source for its full context; related reporting can share the same underlying announcement.